Elephant the movie Essay -- essays research papers

Gus Van Sants Elephant was at in one case critic all toldy praised and denounced by both film re learners and filmgoers alike. The cinematography takes you on a waltz passim a presumablely typical day at an unnamed steep check, stopping through the journey to focus on the stereotypes of school. The jock, the quirky artist, the cliqued girls, the skateboarder, they argon all represented and representative of his film. Van Sant created a film, seemingly without a staunch opinion on the horrors of the columbine shootings. The movie seems distanced from the actors and their actions an unaware participant from the tranquil introduction to the gruesome climax. His seeming lack of a part, lack of a reason for the creation of this film, is exactly the impetus that drives its core meaning. The luxuriously school was as stereotyped and typical as possible, a campus where everyone swears theyve visited once in their life. The visceral climax is at once both soft built up to inevitabil ity by the characterizations of the assailants, yet it also strikes the school suddenly and without warning. Van Sants film is a series of seeming contradictions and paradoxes that create the illusion that he has no stance on the Columbine shootings. His stance, however, is given away in the purposelessness of the film the idyllic comfort of the school, and its subsequent destruction, has no purpose. The Columbine despatch had no purpose. Gus Van Sants estheticized school builds up a world that seems tangible to most students. He carries every right to create his own world and tear it keister down. It is this beauty that he creates that makes the film so much more portentous when it ends. Aesthetic realism is the concept of accepting reality as steadfast therefore, one must find the beauty that is inherent in quotidian life instead of attempting to create beauty. The idea is that aesthetic realism sees all reality including the reality that is oneself, as the aesthetic oneness of opposites, (Siegel). In separate words, life is at once changing and the same. For example, someone is the same somebody when they wake up in the morning and the same person when they go to sleep at night. They havent changed. However, there have until now changed as a person throughout the day, at least minutely. qualify and stability both occur simultaneously. At the same time, Siegel states that it sees the largest purpose o... ...e what send word be easily related to they wouldnt be considered stereotypes otherwise. The beauty that is created during the firstly hour, which is denounced by Foundas as unrealistic, is subsequently get downed in the climax. To create and destroy mediocrity would not be as stirring a translation as Van Sants recreation of perfection coupled with his taxonomical disposal of it. Gus Van Sant has created a world of high school that has every stereotype. He manifests a sense of beauty in every duck soup he creates, with the slow arcing came ra shots combined with the loving caricatures of the students. He finds the aesthetic realism in high school, the elegance inherent in aspects of campus life, and constructs a film around it. It is his own right to create his own view of high school, and while critics can disagree, they should not debase. The initial purposelessness should just be taken at face value it is the lack of purpose in the beginning of the film that makes the lack of purpose in the massacre more obvious. There was no reasoning behind the Columbine shootings, they were a tragic occurrence that had little logic behind it. However, Van Sants film had purpose underneath its exterior.